Next: 3.2.4 Influence of the
 Up: 3.2 Spin Relaxation in
 Previous: 3.2.2 Low Temperature Behaviour
The temperature dependence of (3.9) discussed above 
can be modified through several mechanisms which we will 
consider in turn: anisotropy of 
, finite lifetime
of quasi-particle excitations, and magnetic effects.
The consequences of anisotropy on the ratio 
RS/RN are found by including an angular integral in   
(3.9), and they can be most easily explained by a 
comparison between the
angular average DOS, gA(E), and gS(E) 
of (3.8).
where P(a) is the distribution of the anisotropy a of the gap 
around the Fermi surface.
Even a small anisotropy, such
as that for aluminum[104], transforms the BCS singularity  
in gS(E)
into a mild van Hove singularity at some average 
,and gA is still perfectly gapped with
gA(E)=0 for 
 (see Fig. 3.12a).
The effect of anisotropy is thus to reduce the size of the
coherence peak in RS/RN and to modify the Arrhenius slope 
relative to the isotropic case.
Extreme anisotropy, such as that for non-zero 
angular momentum pairing states, is similar except that gA is 
no longer gapped as there are nodes in 
.For example, for a d-wave order parameter[108],
 as 
. 
Although gA is still peaked in this situation, the coherence peak 
in RS/RN may be completely eliminated[109], and the
exponential temperature dependence is replaced by a power law
, where p = 2 for d-wave, 
and other values of p are obtained[110] for different nodal
structures of 
.This kind of behaviour has been observed[111,112] in  
YBa2Cu3O6.95, for which there is strong evidence of a d-wave
.A p-wave 
 may be the source of similar
temperature dependence in some Heavy Fermion
superconductors[113,114],
while one dimensionality may cause it in some organic
superconductors[115].
  
Figure 3.12:
a) Models of the superconducting DOS:
BCS is gS of Eq.(3.8), Aniso is gA
(Eq.(3.11)) with a gate function
distribution P(a) of width 0.1
, 
 is gD
(Eq.(3.12)) with
, and 
 is gSC
(Eq.(3.13)) with
.b) The value of the Hebel-Slichter integral for
the BCS and lifetime (Eq. (3.12)) broadened gS(E).
The magnetic inelasticity parameter (
) is appropriate
for Mu@C60 in Rb3C60. The BCS temperature dependence 
was used.
  | 
 
Finite lifetime (
) of the quasiparticle excitations of a superconductor
due, for example, to electron-phonon, electron-electron or impurity
scattering can also modify RS/RN. 
This possibility was suggested by 
Hebel and Slichter in their original work[95]
to explain the small size of the coherence peak they observed in Al.
They calculated a DOS which was a version of
Eq. (3.8) smeared by convolution with a gate function of
width 
.A detailed analysis of the temperature dependence of 
RS/RN resulting from this approximation is given by Hebel[116].
A different Ansatz for the DOS was used by
Dynes et al.[117] to describe tunneling measurements:
where 
. However, Allen and Rainer[118] 
point out that for a lifetime due to electron-phonon scattering, one
must resort to the Eliashberg theory of strongly coupled superconductors
[52,119] in which the order parameter becomes complex,
and the DOS is[120]
where[121] 
(
 is the imaginary part), and 
 is determined by the Eliashberg theory and the
coupling constant-phonon spectrum product 
 for the
particular material.
Fibich[122] first treated the problem of calculating
RS/RN using (3.13)
by neglecting the energy dependence of 
, and simply using
 evaluated at the energy which is most important for the
integral (3.9), i.e. 
.The temperature dependence for the imaginary
part 
 due to phonon scattering[122,123] and
scattering from other quasiparticles[121,124] has been 
calculated in the low temperature limit.
For the temperature dependence of the real part 
 (and for 
the parameter 
 in either of the preceding models) it is
reasonable[52] to assume that the temperature dependence
of the real part of the order parameter is
approximately that of the BCS 
.Recently, it has become feasible[125,118] to 
calculate RS/RN using the full strong-coupling 
,thus avoiding these approximations. As input to such a calculation, 
one would ideally first obtain a reasonable 
form for 
. However, according to Akis[125], 
the details of 
 are not important, and
the most significant information in determining RS/RN(T) is summarized 
in the ratio 
, where 
 is the logarithmic moment
of 
 (Eq. (1.8)).
Note that the effect of impurities in the Eliashberg theory has recently been
revisited[126]. These authors find that ``vertex corrections'' from
impurity scattering can increase the size of the coherence peak as
the mean free path is reduced.
Magnetism may also influence
RS/RN(T), for instance,
in the classical example[127] of gaplessness in a superconductor
due to the presence of magnetic impurities,
the coherence peak can be reduced or eliminated and the
exponential fall-off strongly modified[128,129].
Superconductors that are intrinsically magnetic
exhibit similar strong deviations[113,130].
In regard to high-Tc superconductors, 
antiferromagnetic correlations between quasiparticles
have also been shown[109,125] to damp the coherence peak.
However, it should be noted that 
no anomalous behaviour connected with magnetism has been
reported yet in A3C60. Recently[131], the closely related
NH3K3C60 material which is superconducting under high pressure
has been found to exhibit a metal-insulator transition to a magnetic
state[132] at about 40K.
The small bandwidth and large coulomb
interactions between electrons also cause important correlation effects,
for example the magnetism in o-A1C60.
The proximity to a similar magnetic phase may be enhanced by the
analogous polymerization[133] 
of the C60 anions in the Pa
 materials.
 
 
 
  
 Next: 3.2.4 Influence of the
 Up: 3.2 Spin Relaxation in
 Previous: 3.2.2 Low Temperature Behaviour