At the beginning of this chapter
we pictured only PLANE WAVES, in which
the wavefronts (``crests'' of the waves) form long straight
lines (or, in space, flat planes) moving along together in
parallel (separated by one wavelength )
in a common direction
.
One good reason for sticking to this description
for as long as possible (and returning to it every chance we get)
is that it is so simple - we can write down an explicit
formula for the amplitude of a plane wave as a function
of time and space whose qualitative
features are readily apparent (with a little effort).
Another good reason has to do with the fact that
all waves look pretty much like plane waves
when they are far from their origin.14.21
We will come back to this shortly.
A final reason for our love of plane waves is that
they are so easily related to the idea of `` RAYS.''
In GEOMETRICAL OPTICS
it is convenient to picture the wavevector
as a
``ray'' of light (though we can adopt the same notion for
any kind of wave) that propagates along a straight line
like a billiard ball. In fact, the analogy between
and the momentum
of a particle
is more than just a metaphor, as we shall see later.
However, for now it will suffice to borrow this imagery from
Newton and company, who used it very effectively in describing
the corpuscular theory of light.14.22
However, near any localized source of waves
the outgoing wavefronts are nothing like plane waves;
if the dimensions of the source are
small compared to the wavelength
then the outgoing waves look pretty much like
SPHERICAL WAVES. For sources similar in size
to , things can get very complicated.
Christian Huygens (1629-1695) invented the following gimmick for constructing actual wavefronts from spherical waves: