In a hydrogen atom the electron and proton spins 
 can combine in four ways: 
 the SINGLET state 
  has an energy
 
 has an energy 
  J 
 below the three TRIPLET states
 J 
 below the three TRIPLET states 
  ,
, 
  and
 and  which are degenerate in zero magnetic field. 
 The energies of the singlet and triplet
 
 which are degenerate in zero magnetic field. 
 The energies of the singlet and triplet  states 
 are not shifted much by a weak magnetic field
 states 
 are not shifted much by a weak magnetic field 
  (where
 
 (where  is the magnitude of the [negative] magnetic moment 
 of the triplet state), 
 but the
 
 is the magnitude of the [negative] magnetic moment 
 of the triplet state), 
 but the
  states split by
 states split by
  1,±1
 = ±mB.
1,±1
 = ±mB.
 
  
 
 ANSWER:  
This is a simple Boltzmann distribution: 
probability of singlet state
  where
 where 
  is the 
partition function. For B=0,
 is the 
partition function. For B=0,
  , giving
, giving 
  . 
At
. 
At
  J,
 J, 
  and
 and 
  , 
giving
, 
giving
  or
 or 
  = fraction of atoms in the singlet state.
 = fraction of atoms in the singlet state. 
 of an ensemble of H atoms in a weak magnetic field
 
 of an ensemble of H atoms in a weak magnetic field 
  in thermal equilibrium 
 at a temperature
 in thermal equilibrium 
 at a temperature
  . Express your answer 
 in terms of
. Express your answer 
 in terms of
  , m, B and
, m, B and
  .
. 
 ANSWER:  
  or
 or 
  .
. 
 as
 
 as
  and as
 and as
  .
. 
  ANSWER:  
 As
  ,
,
  and 
 the exponentials all approach unity; the two in 
 the numerator cancel, giving
 and 
 the exponentials all approach unity; the two in 
 the numerator cancel, giving 
  . 
 As
. 
 As
  ,
,
  and
 and 
  . However, since
. However, since 
  ,
,
  even faster, so
 even faster, so 
  . 
 Of course, in between
. 
 Of course, in between
  must have 
 nonzero values and there must be a peak in the magnitude 
 somewhere. This could be found by differentiating 
 with respect to
 must have 
 nonzero values and there must be a peak in the magnitude 
 somewhere. This could be found by differentiating 
 with respect to
  and setting the derivative 
 equal to zero, but this was not requested. 
 An example is shown below for the case of
 and setting the derivative 
 equal to zero, but this was not requested. 
 An example is shown below for the case of
  .
. 
  
 
  
 
 in thermal and diffusive equilibrium with a reservoir 
 at temperature
 
 in thermal and diffusive equilibrium with a reservoir 
 at temperature
  and chemical potential
 and chemical potential
  is
 is 
  
 
 ANSWER:  
This is easy if we apply the principles of diffusive 
equilibrium to a given single-particle state 
of energy
  : 
it may be populated by either one particle (N=1) 
or none (N=0); all other values of N are explicitly 
forbidden by the Pauli principle. We use
: 
it may be populated by either one particle (N=1) 
or none (N=0); all other values of N are explicitly 
forbidden by the Pauli principle. We use 
  , 
where is the Gibbs sum.  In this case,
, 
where is the Gibbs sum.  In this case, 
  
 
  . 
Since
. 
Since
  this gives
 this gives 
  .
. 
 from 0 to
 
 from 0 to
  for two cases:
 for two cases: 
  and
 and
  . 
 [Hint:  Let
. 
 [Hint:  Let
  and estimate f at x=0,
 
 and estimate f at x=0,
  and
 
 and
  , its minimum value.]
, its minimum value.] 
 ANSWER:  
 The graph below shows f as a function of
  (i.e.
 (i.e.
  in units of
 
 in units of
  ) for
) for
  and for
 and for
  . 
 For z=1 
 (
. 
 For z=1 
 ( or x=0) 
 we always get
 or x=0) 
 we always get
  and for
 
 and for  (same as
 (same as
  or
 or 
  ) we always get
) we always get
  . 
 For
. 
 For
  (same as
 (same as
  or
 or
  ) 
 we get
) 
 we get
  if
 if
  and
 and 
  if
 
 if
  . That case 
 (
. That case 
 ( ) also gives 
 f = 0.119 at
) also gives 
 f = 0.119 at
  (z=2), as shown. 
 The main thing to realize here is that
 (z=2), as shown. 
 The main thing to realize here is that
  becomes more and more like a step function 
 as
 
 becomes more and more like a step function 
 as
  gets larger and larger (i.e. at low temperature).
 
 gets larger and larger (i.e. at low temperature). 
 
 
  
 
 .
. 
 ANSWER:  At
  the distribution becomes a simple step function 
at
 
 the distribution becomes a simple step function 
at
  : 
 all states below the Fermi energy
: 
 all states below the Fermi energy
  are filled (N=1) and all states above
 
are filled (N=1) and all states above
  are empty (N=0).
 are empty (N=0). 
 . 
 Assume that the fermions do not interact with each other 
 and that
. 
 Assume that the fermions do not interact with each other 
 and that  . 
 What is their chemical potential 
 at zero temperature (also known as the 
 FERMI 
 ENERGY)?
. 
 What is their chemical potential 
 at zero temperature (also known as the 
 FERMI 
 ENERGY)? 
 ANSWER:  
Of the many ways to approach this part, the easiest is to just 
think about it! Since the chemical potential is the incremental 
change in free energy as the last particle is added 
( ), 
and the free energy
), 
and the free energy 
  at
 at
  ,
, 
  is just the energy level at which the last particle 
goes in. For spin-1/2 particles, two can go into each state 
(
 
is just the energy level at which the last particle 
goes in. For spin-1/2 particles, two can go into each state 
( and
 and 
 ) and the states 
are evenly spaced,
) and the states 
are evenly spaced,
  , 
so the last particle goes in at
, 
so the last particle goes in at
  and that is the chemical potential at
 
and that is the chemical potential at
  or FERMI 
ENERGY:
 
or FERMI 
ENERGY:
  .
. 
Note: it has been brought to my attention that some people had seen a derivation of the Fermi-Dirac distribution function before, while others had not; this was correlated with which Engineering specialization people had been following. Since this question is easy to answer if you grasp the basic approach and almost impossible to solve by plugging in standard formulas, it was an excellent test of your ability to synthesize ideas (the whole point of a Physics education) but an unfair one because of the importance of ``prior knowledge.'' I will try to take this into account when making up final marks, by noting which programs people are in and which courses you have taken previously. I may need to get that information from you on the Web.