 -     A   SKEPTICs   GUIDE
 -     A   SKEPTICs   GUIDE    
 
 
 
 
   
At the beginning of this chapter 
we pictured only  PLANE WAVES, in which 
the wavefronts (``crests'' of the waves) form long straight 
lines (or, in space, flat planes) moving along together in 
parallel (separated by one wavelength  )
in a common direction
)
in a common direction  .
One good reason for sticking to this description 
for as long as possible (and returning to it every chance we get) 
is that it is so simple - we can write down an explicit 
formula for the amplitude of a plane wave as a function 
of time and space whose qualitative 
features are readily apparent (with a little effort).  
Another good reason has to do with the fact that 
all waves look pretty much like plane waves 
when they are far from their origin.14.21
We will come back to this shortly.  
A final reason for our love of plane waves is that 
they are so easily related to the idea of `` RAYS.''
.
One good reason for sticking to this description 
for as long as possible (and returning to it every chance we get) 
is that it is so simple - we can write down an explicit 
formula for the amplitude of a plane wave as a function 
of time and space whose qualitative 
features are readily apparent (with a little effort).  
Another good reason has to do with the fact that 
all waves look pretty much like plane waves 
when they are far from their origin.14.21
We will come back to this shortly.  
A final reason for our love of plane waves is that 
they are so easily related to the idea of `` RAYS.'' 
In  GEOMETRICAL OPTICS 
it is convenient to picture the wavevector 
 as a 
``ray'' of light (though we can adopt the same notion for 
any kind of wave) that propagates along a straight line 
like a billiard ball.  In fact, the analogy between
as a 
``ray'' of light (though we can adopt the same notion for 
any kind of wave) that propagates along a straight line 
like a billiard ball.  In fact, the analogy between 
 and the momentum
and the momentum  of a particle 
is more than just a metaphor, as we shall see later.  
However, for now it will suffice to borrow this imagery from 
Newton and company, who used it very effectively in describing 
the corpuscular theory of light.14.22
of a particle 
is more than just a metaphor, as we shall see later.  
However, for now it will suffice to borrow this imagery from 
Newton and company, who used it very effectively in describing 
the corpuscular theory of light.14.22
However, near any localized source of waves 
the outgoing wavefronts are nothing like plane waves; 
if the dimensions of the source are 
small compared to the wavelength 
then the outgoing waves look pretty much like 
 SPHERICAL WAVES.  For sources similar in size 
to   ,  things can get very complicated.
,  things can get very complicated.  
Christian Huygens (1629-1695) invented the following gimmick for constructing actual wavefronts from spherical waves:
![\fbox{ \parbox{3.1in}{ ~\\ [0.15\baselineskip]
\lq\lq All points on a wavefront can . . . 
 . . . face of
tangency\/} to these secondary wavelets.'' \\ [-0.5\baselineskip]
} }](img177.gif)
 
 
 
 
